First Nations interpreters cannot be neutral and should not be invisible

Authors

  • Dima Rusho Monash University

Keywords:

First Nations languages, legal interpreting, impartiality, neutrality, visibility.

Abstract

In this article I explore the challenges faced by First Nations language interpreters working in Australia’s justice system in relation to the explicit requirement of impartiality/neutrality and the implicit expectation of invisibility in their day-to-day work. I interrogate the notion of (in)visibility and explore its potential to contribute to the marginalisation of First Nations interpreters in legal settings and beyond. In particular, I focus on the relationship between impartiality/ neutrality and the visibility of First Nations interpreters. I argue that while impartiality is a stance that can be consciously adopted by professional interpreters, complete neutrality is an impossible and unfair requirement given how neutrality can be impacted by kinship relations, historical racial politics, community expectations, and the power differentials inherent to the justice system. The data analysed are drawn from fieldwork conducted between 2018 and 2019 in the Katherine region of Australia’s Northern Territory. The data include field notes, court observations, as well as interviews with First Nations language interpreters, legal professionals, and judicial officers.

Author Biography

  • Dima Rusho, Monash University
    Dima Rusho is a lecturer in Anthropolgy at the School of Social Sciences, Monas University. Her current research focuses on Indigenous language interpreting and the law, mainly in relation to the cultural and socio-political context of the Northern Territory in Australia. Dima’s other research interests include the relationship between language and knowledge, critical sociolinguistics, and decolonial approaches to language interpreting and translation.

     

     

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28