Patients with non-English language preference: Data from an Australian healthcare facility on reported use of professional interpreting services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.117201.2025.a01Abstract
Patients with a non-English language preference (NELP) require services in a language different from that spoken by English-speaking healthcare practitioners. National guidelines advocate professional interpreting services, but little is known about patients’ perspectives and factors that secure interpreting for them. A total of 1,120 NELP patients in Melbourne were surveyed from 2016 to 2020 in their preferred language. Patients report high awareness and utilisation of free interpreting services, predominantly initiated by healthcare staff rather than themselves. This points to cultural competence among healthcare staff as crucial for them to identify the need for interpreters. Alongside this, some patients rely on family members for linguistic mediation. This may result from patients not (self-)reporting their NELP or from contextual considerations. Amongst the latter are patients’ privacy concerns and a lack of understanding that interpreters are bound to observe ethical principles such as confidentiality and impartiality. These responses underscore the need for explicit explanations from healthcare providers and interpreters to patients about their roles and the protocols they observe.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Emiliano Zucchi , Jim Hlavac, Yue Hu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).